An Intelligent Class: The Development Of A Novel Context Capturing Framework Supporting The Functional Auto-Classification Of Records
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The need to accurately classify records is a core problem in many domains. Current methods for auto-classification focus on a record's content and not its context. As a result, current auto-classification methods are unable to achieve the levels of precision, accuracy, and recall that match or exceed the levels generated by human classifiers. In order to address this challenge, a new methodology is needed that specifies how to extract contextual features from a record in order to improve the auto-classification accuracy, precision, and recall of records at scale. This paper closes this gap, using the diplomatic definition of context to specify a mapping that will operationalize the capturing of context from a record. This mapping, makes it possible to continue developing a formal method for functional auto-classification and contextual feature extraction that will utilize a record's context to improve functional auto-classification accuracy, precision, and recall.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it