MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Seismic Collapse Risk Assessment of Posttensioned Controlled Rocking Masonry Walls

2020· article· en· W3008277088 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Structural Engineering · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicSeismic Performance and Analysis
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOpenSeesMasonryStructural engineeringUnreinforced masonry buildingSeismic loadingSeismic riskEngineeringShear wallResidualSeismic analysisGeotechnical engineeringGeologyReinforced concreteComputer scienceCivil engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The use of vertical unbonded posttensioned (PT) bars in masonry walls results in a controlled rocking behavior that can provide a high drift capacity and recenter the wall to its vertical alignment, minimizing residual drifts after a seismic event. However, because posttensioned controlled rocking masonry walls (PT-CRMWs) are a relatively new seismic force resisting system relative to conventional reinforced masonry (RM) walls with bonded reinforcement (i.e., fixed base walls), no distinct seismic response modification factors are yet provided in North American building codes and design standards for PT-CRMWs. In addition, following the FEMA P695 methodology, the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) reported that some conventional low-rise RM walls could experience an excessive risk of collapse under the maximum considered earthquake (MCE). For these reasons, the current study evaluates the collapse risk of PT-CRMWs when designed using the seismic response modification factors currently assigned for special RM walls. In this respect, OpenSees is first used to develop and validate multispring macro models to simulate the seismic response of 20 PT-CRMWs with different configurations and axial load levels. The models are then used to perform nonlinear static and dynamic analyses following the FEMA P695 methodology, which involves evaluating the wall overstrength and seismic collapse margin ratio relative to the MCE. The results demonstrate that low-rise PT-CRMWs, designed with the seismic response modification factors currently assigned by the North American building codes and design standards to special RM walls, can meet the FEMA P695 acceptance criteria for the expected seismic collapse risk under the MCE. However, the peak forces in high rise PT-CRMWs are governed by higher mode effects, which increase the collapse risk due to shear. Finally, the influence of confinement on reducing the collapse risk of PT-CRMW archetypes is evaluated.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.057
Threshold uncertainty score0.652

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.213
Teacher spread0.207 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it