MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3008292056 · doi:10.1109/jiot.2020.2976857

Rugged Linear Array for IoT Applications

2020· article· en· W3008292056 on OpenAlexaff
Lidong Chi, Zibin Weng, Meng Shu, Yihong Qi, Jun Fan, Weihua Zhuang, James L. Drewniak

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Internet of Things Journal · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicEnergy Harvesting in Wireless Networks
Canadian institutionsUniversity of WaterlooWestern University
FundersNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsAntenna measurementAntenna (radio)Antenna gainComputer scienceDipole antennaOmnidirectional antennaWidebandAntenna factorCoaxial antennaElectrical engineeringAntenna arrayAntenna efficiencyBalunTelecommunicationsAcousticsEngineeringPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this article, a rugged linear array is proposed for covering both the LTE and 5G bands with an intermediate gain. The antenna is composed of a driven element, a set of directors, and a set of reflectors, where the excited element is a wideband high-efficiency electromagnetic structure (WHEMS) and the parasitic elements consist of metal rods. To achieve a rugged design, similar to the classic Yagi antenna, all of the elements should be conductively connected, so that it can be welded. The weldable mechanism is started on the driven radiating element. In addition, a balun is introduced in the antenna to reduce the influence of unbalanced common-mode currents. A wind resistance analysis is also presented, where the drag force of the proposed antenna is approximately a quarter of that for an antenna with a metal plate. The antenna exhibits a gain of 10.8-13.3 dBi for a 78% fractional bandwidth (1.7-3.7 GHz), which is a sevenfold increase from that of the Yagi antenna, without sacrificing the gain or rugged design. The proposed antenna has the advantages of a simple feeding arrangement, low cost, lightweight, low-wind resistance, and rugged structure; and is suitable for all-weather large-scale Internet-of-Things (IoT) deployment at a rural site or in a harsh networking environment.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.862
Threshold uncertainty score0.514

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.234
Teacher spread0.215 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations21
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Internet of Things JournalSame topicEnergy Harvesting in Wireless NetworksFrench-language works237,207