MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3008295067 · doi:10.9734/jpri/2020/v32i130393

Comparison of Two Different Ozone Injection Sites for Knee Osteoarthritis, Tibio-femoral Joint versus Supra-patellar Recess: An Open Randomized Clinical Trial

2020· article· en· W3008295067 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Masoud Hashemi, Mehrdad Taheri, Payman Dadkhah, Hasti Hassani, Mohammadhossein Ataie, Mahshid Ghasemi, Mohamad Amin Pourhoseingholi, Ali Solhpour

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Pharmaceutical Research International · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMedical and Biological Ozone Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineWOMACOsteoarthritisRandomized controlled trialVisual analogue scaleSurgeryKnee painPatellaAnesthesia

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy of ozone injection at Tibio-femoral joint with Supra-patellar recess on knee osteoarthritis (OA).
 Methods: In this randomized, controlled clinical trial, 99 patients with symptomatic knee OA were randomized into two groups. 47 patients selected to receive 7-8 ml ozone (20 µg/ml) through Tibio-femoral joint injection, and 49 patients received 10 ml ozone (20 µg/ml) through supra-patellar recess injection by using in-plane ultrasound-guided. The primary outcome was the change from baseline in the visual analogue scale (VAS) (0-100 mm) pain score during 3 months after injection. Secondary outcome measures included the Western Ontario and McMaster universities OA Index (WOMAC), Lequesne index, time “Up and Go” (TUG) test, single-limb stance (SLS) tests, patient satisfaction, and adverse effects. All of these measurements were evaluated at the base time, 48 hours, 2 weeks, 1 month, 2 months, and 3 months after injection.
 Results: Both groups had significantly improvement in the primary and secondary outcome measures. VAS pain score except at the 3–month follow-up (16.8±13.3 versus 18.1±16.6, 95% CI, -7.33 to 4.73, p =0.6), WOMAC pain score, WOMAC stiffness score at all evaluated times, and WOMAC total score at 48 hours after injection (95% CI, -19.4 to -4.9) were significantly better among Tibio-femoral ozone injection compare to Supra-patellar recess injection (95% CI, -20.68 to -6.51, p<0.001)). In both groups satisfaction, TUG and SLS times were improved, but no significant difference was seen between groups (p>0.05). At the 3-month follow-up, WOMAC pain and total scores for only Tibio-femoral joint injection group as well as WOMAC function, TUG and SLS times for both groups were gradually coming back to the baseline.
 Conclusion: Ozone injection in both groups was associated with pain relief, functional improvement, and quality of life in patient with knee OA. Pain and stiffness of joint were improved better in Supra-patellar recess ozone injection.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.013
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.032
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Randomized trial · Consensus signal: Randomized trial
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.075
Threshold uncertainty score0.998

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0130.032
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.728
GPT teacher head0.655
Teacher spread0.073 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designRandomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Pharmaceutical Research InternationalSame topicMedical and Biological Ozone ResearchFrench-language works237,207