MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3008307535 · doi:10.2118/199654-ms

Simplifying Well Abandonments Using Shale as a Barrier

2020· article· en· W3008307535 on OpenAlexaff
Eric van Oort, Maria Juenger, Munir Aldin, Akshay Thombare, Mike McDonald

Bibliographic record

VenueIADC/SPE International Drilling Conference and Exhibition · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicDrilling and Well Engineering
Canadian institutionsPQ Corporation (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOil shaleCasingGeologyDrillingPetroleum engineeringCreepSubmarine pipelineCompletion (oil and gas wells)Geotechnical engineeringAbandonment (legal)Mining engineeringEngineeringMechanical engineeringMaterials sciencePaleontology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Well abandonment is one of the biggest challenges in the oil and gas industry, both in terms of cost and effort as well as the technical hurdles associated with wellbore isolation for an indefinite term. A mechanism that may be exploited to simplify well abandonments is using natural shale formations for the creation of annular barriers. Currently, uncemented annuli often require casing milling and pulling before abandonment plugs can be set, which necessitates the use of a drilling rig. This is an expensive, time- and labor-intensive process, particularly offshore. However, shale creep may naturally form a barrier behind uncemented casing sections. With a qualified annular shale barrier in place, the well may only require the setting of abandonment plugs within the existing casing string(s), a task that can often be done rigless and with significantly less effort. The work described in this paper presents the results of a rock mechanical investigation into the creep behavior of North Sea shales and their ability to form effective annular barriers. Field core from the Lark-Horda shale was used to conduct dedicated, customized experiments that simulated the behavior of shale confined under downhole effective stress, pressure and temperature conditions to fill in an annular space behind a simulated casing string. Full scale tri-axial rock mechanics equipment was used for testing cylindrical shale samples obtained from well-preserved field core in a set-up that mimicked an uncemented casing section of a well. The deformation behavior of the shale was monitored for days to weeks, and the formation of the annular barrier was characterized using dedicated strain measurements and pressure pulse decay probing of the annular space. The large-scale lab results clearly show that the Lark-Horda shales will form competent low permeability annular barriers when left uncemented, as confirmed using pressure-pulse decay measurements. They also show that experimental conditions influence the rate of barrier formation: higher effective stress, higher temperature and beneficial manipulation of the annular fluid chemistry all have a significant effect. This then opens up the possibility of activating shale formations that do not naturally create barriers by themselves into forming them, e.g. by exposing them to low annular pressure, elevated temperature, different annular fluid chemistry, or a combination. The results are in very good agreement with field observations reported earlier by several North Sea operators.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.293
Threshold uncertainty score0.857

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.238
Teacher spread0.212 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations11
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIADC/SPE International Drilling Conference and ExhibitionSame topicDrilling and Well EngineeringFrench-language works237,207