MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3008342247 · doi:10.5753/wit.2017.3423

O Computar em uma Perspectiva Queer: considerando os espaços hacker e maker

2017· article· pt· W3008342247 on OpenAlexaff
Leander Cordeiro de Oliveira, Marília Abrahão Amaral

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languagept
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicDigital Economy and Work Transformation
Canadian institutionsASTER
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHackerQueerPhilosophySociologyComputer scienceHumanitiesComputer securityGender studies

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Construções e reconstruções socioculturais são constantes e este processo se pauta nos valores que estão permeados entre os sujeitos. O fazer computacional e seus ambientes, sistemas e sujeitos vivenciam este processo e podem acabar construindo situações normativas e excludentes. É por meio destas constantes mudanças que o presente artigo pretende apresentar um debate teórico acerca das normatividades da área, compreendendo como uma possibilidade de abertura os movimentos Hacker e Maker e as desconstruções propostas pela Teoria Queer.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.007
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.011
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.029
Threshold uncertainty score0.034

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0070.011
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0040.004
Science and technology studies0.0120.037
Scholarly communication0.0290.027
Open science0.0020.011
Research integrity0.0050.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0100.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.036
GPT teacher head0.301
Teacher spread0.265 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicDigital Economy and Work TransformationFrench-language works237,207