Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cette étude s’inspire de la soif d’un théâtre vivant d’Antonin Artaud (1896-1948). On commence par la recherche des points de contact entre le théâtre de la cruauté et la liturgie chrétienne dans la perspective de l’appel à la participation active. Ensuite, on interroge la transcription philosophique du geste artélien opérée par Derrida (1930-2004) et, notamment, la portée liturgique de la critique théologique du théâtre, c’est-à-dire, la critique de la teneur théologique de tout théâtre représentationnel. On conclut en revisitant la question du statut des médiations sensibles, dans le but de consolider l’intuition d’un changement culturel plus ample au sein duquel on peut situer l’intérêt pour l’immédiateté symbolique et rituelle qui caractérise autant les propositions d’Artaud que celles de la théologie liturgique naissante.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".