MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Differential effects of the 1,25D3-MARRS receptor (ERp57/PDIA3) on murine mammary gland development depend on the vitamin D3 dose

2020· article· en· W3008398185 on OpenAlexafffund
Allison M. Wilkin, R Sullivan, Thao Trinh, Michael Edson, Benjamin Kozlowski, Kelly A. Meckling

Bibliographic record

VenueSteroids · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicVitamin D Research Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Guelph
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsMammary glandCalcitriol receptorEndocrinologyInternal medicineVitaminVitamin D and neurologyBiologyDuctal cellsReceptorMedicineBreast cancerFat padCancerAdipose tissue

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

1,25 dihydroxyvitamin D3 (1,25D3) is the most potent biologically active form of vitamin D3. Its actions on the mammary gland include cell growth inhibition and anti-cancer effects. This study's purpose was to explore the role of the 1,25D3-membrane associated rapid response steroid (MARRS) receptor in the mammary gland using a tissue-specific knockout mouse model and a vitamin D3 dietary intervention. Three genotype groups were created using the Cre/loxp system to knock-down (+/-) and knockout (-/-) the MARRS receptor in epithelial cells of mammary glands (MG). Abdominal MGs were collected from 6-week old female mice (n = 94) on diets of 10,000 IU/kg (excess), 1,000 IU/kg (sufficient) or 0 IU/kg (deficient) of D3. There was a significant interaction between genotype and diet regarding number of terminal end buds (TEBs) (p = 0.001) and ductal coverage of the fat pad (p = 0.03). MARRS -/- mice on the sufficient diet had significantly fewer TEBs (p = 0.001) compared to MARRS +/+ on the same diet, but the opposite effect was seen in mice on the excess diet. There were no effects of genotype on TEBs when animals were vitamin D3 deficient. These results suggest that there is an effect of MARRS on mammary gland development that is dependent on 25(OH)D status, specifically, altering the number of highly proliferative TEBs. Increased numbers of TEBs have been correlated with increased breast cancer risk later in life. Therefore the results of this study warrant further examination of 25(OH)D status and recommendations in adolescent humans to reduce dietary effects on future breast cancer risk.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.464
Threshold uncertainty score0.513

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.253
Teacher spread0.234 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2020
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSteroidsSame topicVitamin D Research StudiesFrench-language works237,207