Juan Benet y el pensamiento místico: más allá del fatalismo = Juan Benet and mystical thought: beyond fatalism
Bibliographic record
Abstract
El presente artículo aborda la influencia mística en la obra literaria de Juan Benet. Es un aspecto crucial para entender el deseo de los protagonistas de sus novelas de volver al origen y de recomenzar la historia frente a la ruindad de un mundo en guerra y en destrucción. Es un anhelo, por supuesto, frustrado por la cruel realidad que les rodea de guerra, de ruinas y de destrucción física y moral. Esto se puede apreciar sobre todo en novelas tales como Volverás a Región, Una meditación, Un viaje de invierno o Saúlante Samuel y en su libro de ensayos El ángel del señor abandona a Tobías.This article is about mystical influence in the literary works of Juan Benet. This is a crucial aspect so as to understand the desire of the protagonists of his novels to return to the origin and to start over history against the evilness of a world in war and in destruction. Of course, it is a longing which has been frustrated by the cruel reality which surrounds them, with war, ruins, and physical and moral destruction. All this is obvious in such novels as Return to Region, A Meditation, A Winter Trip and Saul Facing Samueland in his book of essays The Angel of the Lord Abandons Tobit.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.008 | 0.014 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".