A112 ANGIOEDEMA,A RARE YET AN IMPORTANT CAUSE OF ABDOMINAL PAIN. A CASE STUDY AND LITERATURE REVIEW
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Background Abdominal pain is a common gastroenterological symptom with an extensive deferential diagnoses. Angioedema is an important cause to remember after the more common causes have been excluded.It is caused by a deficiency in the inhibitor of the first component of classical complement pathway and is divided into hereditary or acquired.Acquired angioedema is associated with autoimmune or lymphoproliferative neoplasms.The clinical features of both include recurrent,self-limiting and circumscribed edema affecting the subcutaneous tissue of the upper respiratory airways and gastrointestinal tract. Aims We describe an interesting case of acquired angioedema presenting with recurrent abdominal pain. We also systematically review the current literature on this rare entity. Methods A search of electronic databases was performed inclusive to September 2019, for all studies and reviews of patients with acquired angioedema manifested as recurrent attacks of abdominal pain. Results: Case Report: 65 year old lady ho has an at least 2 year long history of abdominal pain and bloating associated on some occasions with nausea and vomiting.She presented to our emergency department in August,2018 with a day history of severe generalized abdominal pain and was found to have circumferential thickening,edema with mucosal hyperenhancement involving the distal segment of the small bowel.Splenomegaly was noted on that study.A double balloon enteroscopy was planned,but ultimately cancelled as her ileitis had resolved.The patient was discharged home as her pain resolved with conservative management which included intravenous fluid, pain medications and antiemetics.She then represented to the hospital on September 16, 2019 severe abdominal pain and throat tightness associated with shortness of breath. Again,noted was an extremely short segment of ileum with mucosal edema and hyperenhancement which resolved on a repeat CT scan done during that admission on September 18th, 2019.In light of the patient’s symptoms,CT scan findings,progressive anemia, thrombocytopenia and splenomegaly. It was thought that her abdominal pain is related to secondary to angioedema driven by a lymphoproliferative process as evident by the splenomegaly and worsening cytopenia. A bone marrow was done which revealed clonal B, so the diagnosis of lymphoma was made. The patient’s C1 esterase was 0.2 with reduced functional activity.CH50 less 10 perecent. A diagnosis of acquired angioedema was made and the patient was started on BERINERT 3000 IU SQ every three days with 1500 IU for break through with significant improvement in the frequency and severity of abdominal pain episodes. Conclusions Acquired angioedema is to be considered as a cause of recurrent abdominal pain in a patient with a lymphoproliferative malignancy after common causes and etiologies have been ruled out. Funding Agencies None
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.009 | 0.007 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".