Bibliographic record
Abstract
SUMMARY Different data components of teleseismic waveforms are related by transfer functions that depend only on receiver-side structure. This is the common basis of a number of teleseismic techniques, including receiver functions and shear wave splitting analysis. Common trace misfits used in these analysis techniques are shown to be equivalent to band-limited comparisons of real and synthetic transfer functions. The data deconvolution used in receiver function analysis leads to reduced structural resolution compared to direct trace-based misfits such as cross-convolution, with direct transfer function modelling of a data trace having the particular advantage of a physically meaningful misfit. Having established that the intertrace transfer function contains all available structural information, the sensitivity of transfer functions to structure is examined for a series of teleseismic scenarios. Transfer functions for the teleseismic P coda show a strong sensitivity to shallow low-velocity structures such as sedimentary basins; the Sp precursors used in S receiver functions are less affected. Examination of transfer functions for shear wave splitting shows that response complexities occur at frequencies too high to be observable in teleseismic studies, and that the dominant control on the response is the splitting intensity.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".