MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3008508067 · doi:10.2136/sssaspecpub60.c3

Soil and Water Conservation Advances in the Semiarid Northern Great Plains

2010· book-chapter· en· W3008508067 on OpenAlexaffabout
D. L. Tanaka, Drew J. Lyon, Perry R. Miller, S. D. Merrill, B.G. McConkey

Bibliographic record

VenueSSSA special publication series · 2010
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicSoil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
Canadian institutionsAgriculture and Agri-Food Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSoil conservationEnvironmental scienceAgricultureDryland farmingAgroforestryPrecipitationResource (disambiguation)CroppingWater resourcesGeographyEcology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This chapter deals with the semiarid Northern Great Plains (NGP), which includes parts of Montana, North Dakota, South Dakota, Wyoming, Nebraska, Alberta, and Saskatchewan. It discusses and illustrates how advances in soil and water conservation technology have evolved to improve precipitation use and to develop sustainable agricultural systems that are resilient for the NGP. The chapter presents an example to demonstrate that more intensive agriculture is often more sustainable than low input agriculture. Recent dryland cropping systems research efforts in the NGP have focused on the elimination of summer fallow, with its negative effects on soil quality and its inefficient soil water storage. To more efficiently use precipitation and energy from the sun in the future, people will need to develop techniques that not only control soil erosion and conserve water, but enhance the soil resource.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.020

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.198
Teacher spread0.186 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations50
Published2010
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSSSA special publication seriesSame topicSoil Carbon and Nitrogen DynamicsFrench-language works237,207