Asma e Transtornos Psiquiátricos: Uma Revisão da Literatura
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Asma e Transtornos Mentais são condições comuns e com grande morbimortalidade associada. Há evidências de que haja relação entre eles. Neste estudo revisamos narrativamente a prevalência de transtornos mentais em pacientes com asma; os efeitos da comorbidade psiquiátrica sobre o desfecho da asma; e o impacto do tratamento dessas condições. Foi realizada busca no PubMed e no Google Acadêmico usando as palavras chave asthma e mental disorders. Resultados: Transtornos psiquiátricos são mais prevalentes em pacientes com asma quando comparados à população geral e associam-se a pior controle dos sintomas, maiores taxas de internação, pior qualidade de vida e trazem maior encargo ao sistema de saúde. Conclusão: Pacientes com asma, sobretudo aqueles de difícil controle, devem ser avaliados quanto à presença de doença psiquiátrica. Entretanto, são necessários mais estudos para compreender o impacto do tratamento da comorbidade psiquiátrica sobre a asma.Palavras chave: asma, transtornos psiquiátricos, revisão narrativa
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.020 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.008 | 0.009 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.006 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".