MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3008607699 · doi:10.1049/iet-cta.2019.0349

Non‐fragile sliding mode control of discrete switched singular systems with time‐varying delays

2019· article· en· W3008607699 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIET Control Theory and Applications · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicStability and Control of Uncertain Systems
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
FundersNatural Science Foundation of Shandong ProvinceNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsControl theory (sociology)Discrete time and continuous timeSliding mode controlMode (computer interface)Computer scienceControl (management)MathematicsPhysicsNonlinear systemArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This study tends to solve the finite‐time boundedness (FTB) problems for discrete switched singular systems with time‐varying delays via a non‐fragile sliding mode approach. The remarkable feature of the provided method is that a new sliding surface function is constructed such that a full‐order dynamic system is acquired. Thus, a non‐fragile sliding mode controller can be proposed to guarantee the FTB of the dynamic system. Therein, by employing the multiple Lyapunov‐like functions and dwell time (DT) method, sufficient conditions and the DT of switching signal are given to ensure the FTB of the sliding mode dynamics. These results are then applied to the FTB issue, being expressed as a solvable optimisation problem. Furthermore, by employing a discrete reaching condition, the proposed sliding mode controller can guarantee the reachability of the quasi‐sliding mode. The validity of the proposed theorems is verified through a numerical example.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.835
Threshold uncertainty score0.794

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.003
GPT teacher head0.194
Teacher spread0.191 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it