A scalable optical neural network architecture using coherent detection
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Storing, processing, and learning from data is a central task in both industrial practice and modern science. Recent advances in modern statistical learning, particularly Deep Neural Networks (DNNs), have given record breaking performance on tasks in game playing,1, 2 natural language processing,3 computer vision,4 computational biology,5, 6 and many others. The rapid growth of the field has been driven by an increase in the amount of public datasets,7 improvements to algorithms,8 and a substantial growth in computing power.9 In order to perform well on these tasks networks have had to grow in size, learning more complicated statistical features. The training and deployment of these large neural networks has spurred the creation of many neural network accelerators to aid in the computation of these networks.10-12 Existing general purpose computing devices such as CPUs and GPUs are limited both by thermal dissipation per unit area and yield associated with large chips.13, 14 The design of Application Specific Integrated circuits (ASICs) has aided in decreasing the energy consumption per workload substantially by limiting the supported operations on chip. An example of this is the first generation tensor processing unit (TPU)15 which is able to perform the inference of large convolutional neural networks in datacenter in <10ms with an idle power of 28W and an workload power of 40W. It may seen counterintuitive then that the limiting factor for the implementation of DNNs is not computation, but rather the energy and bandwidth associated with reading and writing data from memory as well as the energy cost of moving data inside of the ASIC.15, 16 Several emerging technologies, such as in-memory computing,17 memristive crossbar arrays18 promise increased performance, but these emerging architectures suffer from calibration issues and limited accuracy.19 Photonics as a field has had tremendous success in improving the energy efficiency of data interconnects.20 This has motivated the creation of optical neural networks (ONNs) based on 3D-printed diffractive elements,21 spiking neural networks utilizing ring-resonators,22 reservoir computing23 and nanophotonic circuits.24 However, these architectures have several issues. 3D-printed diffractive networks and schemes requiring spatial light modulators are non-programmable, meaning that they are unable to perform the task of training. Nanophotonic circuits allow for an O(N2) array of interferometers to be programmed, providing passive matrix-vector multiplication. However, the large (≈1mm2) size of on chip electro-optic interferometers means that scaling to an array of 100x100 would require 10; 000mm2 of silicon, demonstrating the limitations of scaling this architecture. To date no architecture has demonstrated high-speed (GHz) speed computation with more than N ≥ 10; 000 neurons. Here we present an architecture that is scalable to N ≥ 106 neurons. The key mechanism of this architecture is balanced homodyne detection. By scaling the architecture to such a large size we show that we can decimate energy costs per operation associated with the optical component of this architecture, reaching a bound set by shot noise on the receiving photodetectors which leads to classification error. We call this bound a standard quantum limit (SQL) which reaches 100zJ/MAC on problems such as MNIST. We also analyze the energy consumption using existing technologies and show that sub-fJ/MAC energy consumption should be possible. This paper is organized as follows: In section 1 we will discuss the function of this architecture as a matrixmatrix processor. In section 2 we will analyze the energy consumption of the architecture. In section 3 we will discuss methods for training and extending the accelerator to a broader scope of problems, namely convolutionally neural networks (CNNs).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".