MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

PoisSolver: a Tool for Modelling Silicon Dangling Bond Clocking Networks

2020· preprint· en· W3008738611 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicQuantum-Dot Cellular Automata
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceQuantum dot cellular automatonNode (physics)Scheme (mathematics)Electronic circuitDangling bondElectronic engineeringSiliconLogic gateElectrical engineeringOptoelectronicsEngineeringMaterials scienceAlgorithmMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Advancements in the fabrication of silicon dangling bonds (SiDBs) reveal a potential platform for clocked field coupled nanocomputing structures. This work introduces PoisSolver, a finite element simulator for investigating clocked SiDB systems in the SiQAD design tool. Three clocking schemes borrowed from prior work on quantum-dot cellular automata are examined as potential building blocks for a general clocking framework for SiDB circuits. These clocking schemes are implemented in SiQAD, and power estimates are performed with geometrically agnostic methods to characterise each clocking scheme. Clocking schemes using a 14 nm technology node are found to dissipate 10-100 μW cm- <sup xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">2</sup> at 1 GHz and 1-10W cm- <sup xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">2</sup> at 1 THz.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Scholarly communication
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.563
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0030.004
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.047
GPT teacher head0.259
Teacher spread0.212 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicQuantum-Dot Cellular AutomataFrench-language works237,207