MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3008749582 · doi:10.1093/jcag/gwz047.018

A19 NOVEL HLA-DQ2 TRANSGENIC MICE DEVELOP GLUTEN-IMMUNOPATHOLOGY FOLLOWING GLUTEN SENSITIZATION

2020· article· en· W3008749582 on OpenAlexaff
Alexandra Clarizio, Heather J. Galipeau, Jennifer Jury, L Rondeau, J Godbout, Leslie Williams, B W Anderson, Elena F. Verdú

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCeliac Disease Research and Management
Canadian institutionsMcMaster UniversityPopulation Health Research Institute
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGliadinGlutenImmunologyTissue transglutaminaseIntraepithelial lymphocyteImmune systemEnteropathyCoeliac diseaseMedicineHuman leukocyte antigenBiologyAntigenDiseaseInternal medicinePathology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background Celiac disease (CeD), an autoimmune and chronic inflammatory enteropathy triggered by the ingestion of gluten, is associated with HLA-DQ2 (~90%) and, to a lesser extent, HLA-DQ8. We previously characterized a humanized mouse model of gluten sensitivity that expresses the HLA-DQ8 allele, and that develops mild innate and adaptive immune pathways related to DQ8+ CeD patients. Gluten peptides recognized in the context of DQ2 differ from those bound to DQ8 molecules and homozygous carriage of HLA-DQ2 provides higher risk for CeD development. Thus, characterization of a transgenic HLA-DQ2 model would allow for the investigation of disease pathways that affect the majority of celiac patients. Aims Our aim was to determine gluten-immune responses and small intestinal pathology in C57BL/6 mice humanized with the HLA DR3-DQ2 gene. Methods To break oral tolerance to gluten, DR3-DQ2 mice were orally sensitized with gliadin (5mg/mL) and cholera toxin (CT; 2.5mg/mL) before being challenged with gluten (10mg/mL) for three weeks. Non-sensitized DR3-DQ2 controls mice received CT and a sham challenge. To determine the effects of long-term exposure to gluten, gliadin sensitized DR3-DQ2 mice were placed on a gluten-containing diet for twelve weeks. Controls were given CT and remained on a gluten-free diet. Pathology was evaluated by CD3+ intraepithelial lymphocytes (IELs) counts; villus-crypt (V/C) ratios. Gluten-induced immune responses were evaluated by anti-tissue transglutaminase-2 (tTG) and anti-gliadin antibodies, inflammatory gene expression by Nanostring Technology, and CD4+ T cell proliferation using flow cytometry. Intestinal permeability was measured in vitro by Ussing Chamber. Results DR3-DQ2 mice that were sensitized and challenged with gluten for three weeks had higher IEL counts, lower V/C ratios, higher anti-gliadin and tTG antibodies, which are used in the serological diagnosis of the disease. Gluten sensitized mice also has higher expression of pro-inflammatory genes, and an induction of gluten specific T cells, but no changes in permeability compared to control mice. DR3-DQ2 mice given a gluten-containing diet for 12 weeks also had higher IEL counts, lower V/C ratios, and higher anti-gliadin and tTG antibodies, but had no changes in permeability compared to controls. Conclusions These results indicate that mice humanized with the HLA DR3-DQ2 gene show innate and gluten-specific immune responses following sensitization. Thus, mice expressing HLA-DQ2 represents a novel model of gluten sensitivity that can be used to investigate celiac disease pathways related to gluten peptide repertoire that binds to DQ2 MHC class II, encoded by the HLA gene expressed by the majority of celiac patients. Supported by CIHR to EFV and OGS to AVC Funding Agencies CIHROGS

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.019

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.239
Teacher spread0.225 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the Canadian Association of GastroenterologySame topicCeliac Disease Research and ManagementFrench-language works237,207