Automated Colorization of a Grayscale Image With Seed Points Propagation
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In this paper, we propose a fully automatic image colorization method for grayscale images using neural network and optimization. For a determined training set including the gray images and its corresponding color images, our method segments grayscale images into superpixels and then extracts features of particular points of interest in each superpixel. The obtained features and their RGB values are given as input for, the training colorization neural network of each pixel. To achieve a better image colorization effect in shorter running time, our method further propagates the resulting color points to neighboring pixels for improved colorization results. In the propagation of color, we present a cost function to formalize the premise that neighboring pixels should have the maximum positive similarity of intensities and colors; we then propose our solution to solving the optimization problem. At last, a guided image filter is employed to refine the colorized image. Experiments on a wide variety of images show that the proposed algorithms can achieve superior performance over the state-of-the-art algorithms.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it