MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

EEG signal Extraction Utilizing Null Space Approach

2019· article· en· W3008800301 on OpenAlexaff
Luay Yassin Taha, Esam Abdel‐Raheem

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicBlind Source Separation Techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Windsor
Fundersnot available
KeywordsElectroencephalographyIndependent component analysisComputer scienceArtifact (error)Pattern recognition (psychology)Artificial intelligenceFastICASIGNAL (programming language)Noise (video)Null (SQL)Blind signal separationSpeech recognitionData miningChannel (broadcasting)Image (mathematics)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The aim of this paper is to apply the Null space algorithm to extract Electroencephalography (EEG) signals and remove the Electrocardiogram (ECG) artifact. First, the EEG signals are modelled using the linear mixture model. Then, the Null space algorithm is applied to extract all EEG signals. Simulation results, using synthesized EEG data, show that the model is successfully extracting all the unknown EEG signals and the readiness potential, as well. Results, using real EEG data, show that the model is successfully extracting the unknown EEG signal and removing the ECG artifacts. The algorithm is tested using the correlation and the signal-to-noise ratio extraction metrics, and the results show considerable improvements as compared to fast independent component analysis (FastICA) and parallel linear predictor (PLP) algorithms.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.951
Threshold uncertainty score0.457

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.273
Teacher spread0.252 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicBlind Source Separation TechniquesFrench-language works237,207