MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3008816548

Mii lea "davi govvádallan"? Ehtalaš prinsihpat

2018· article· hu· W3008816548 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Daniel Chartier

Bibliographic record

VenueArchipelago (University of Quebec in Montreal) · 2018
Typearticle
Languagehu
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicHistorical and Archaeological Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesArt
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Oarjemáilmmi dáiddárat ja čállit leat govvádallan ja ovdanbuktán Davviriikkaid jahkečuđiid čađa, mii lea dagahan ahte, logijagiid suksessiva akkumulašuvnnain diskurssaiguin, leat ráhkaduvvon "davi govvádallamat" - mat vulget "Davvin" Skandinávias, Ruonáeatnamis ja Ruoššas, "davvi allagassii" dahje Davvináhpái. Oarjemáilmmálaččat leat johtán davvináhpái beare jahkečuođi dás ovdal, mii dagaha ahte "Davvi" lea buođus duppalgeahčastagas: Geahčastat mii boahtá olggobealde - hábmejuvvon erenoamážit oarjemáilmmálaš govvádallamiiguin - ja geahčastat mii boahtá siskkáldasat - Davi kultuvrrain (Inuit, Skandináva, Cree, jna.). Dat vuosttaš dávjá álkiduvvo ja nubbi hilgojuvvo. Jus mii háliidat áddet mii "Davvi" lea oppalaš perspektiivvas, fertet jearrat guokte jearaldaga: mo definerejit govvádallamat davi, ja makkár ehtalaš prinsihpat berrejit stivret mo mii dulkot davi kultuvrraid oažžun dihte ollislaš oainnu das (maiddá, erenoamážit daid maid lullin leat badjelgeahččan)? Dán artihkkalis geahččala čálli loktet dán guokte jearaldaga, vuos dan bokte ahte definere mat leat govvádallamat daviin, ja dasto evttohusain fátmmastit prográmma "rekomplekseret" kultuvrralaš Árktisa.
\nMáŋggagielat almmuhus sámegillii, muhto maiddá eŋgelasgillii, dárugillii, ránskagillii, ruoššagillii, ruoŧagillii ja dánskkagillii.
\nLe Nord est un espace imaginé et représenté depuis des siècles par les artistes et les écrivains du monde occidental, ce qui a mené, au fil du temps et de l'accumulation successive de couches de discours, à la création d'un " imaginaire du Nord " - que ce Nord soit celui de la Scandinavie, du Groenland, de la Russie ou du Grand Nord, ou encore des pôles. Or les Occidentaux ont atteint le Pôle Nord il n'y a qu'un siècle, ce qui fait du " Nord " le produit d'un double regard, de l'extérieur - les représentations, surtout occidentales - et de l'intérieur - les cultures nordiques (inuites, scandinaves, cries, etc.). Les premières étant souvent simplifiées et les secondes méconnues, si l'on souhaite étudier le " Nord " dans une perspective d'ensemble, nous devons donc poser deux questions : comment définir le Nord par l'imaginaire ? Selon quels principes éthiques devons-nous considérer les cultures nordiques pour en avoir une vue complète, incluant notamment celles qui ont été minorées par le Sud ? Nous répondrons ici à ces deux questions, d'abord en définissant l'imaginaire du Nord, puis en proposant un programme intégrateur pour " recomplexifier " l'Arctique culturel. Édition multilingue en sâme du Nord, mais aussi en français, norvégien, suédois, danois, russe et anglais.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.373
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.004
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.188
Teacher spread0.168 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueArchipelago (University of Quebec in Montreal)Same topicHistorical and Archaeological StudiesFrench-language works237,207