MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3008831843 · doi:10.1093/jcag/gwz047.021

A22 ADVERSE EARLY LIFE EVENTS ARE COMMON IN PATIENTS WITH FUNCTIONAL AND ORGANIC GASTROINTESTINAL DISORDERS

2020· article· en· W3008831843 on OpenAlexaff
C V Noejovich, Pedro Morell Miranda, Stephen M. Collins, Elena F. Verdú, María Inés Pinto-Sánchez, Přemysl Berčík

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicGastrointestinal motility and disorders
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineIrritable bowel syndromeInternal medicineAdverse effectInflammatory bowel diseaseDiseaseGastroenterologyQuality of life (healthcare)Organic diseaseFunctional gastrointestinal disorder

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background Stressful events in childhood have been associated with the development of functional gastrointestinal (GI) disorders in adulthood, especially irritable bowel syndrome. The influence of early life adverse events in patients with common organic disorders, such as celiac disease and inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), has been poorly investigated. Aims To evaluate the frequency of early life adverse events in patients with organic and functional gastrointestinal disorders compared to healthy controls. Methods Adult patients with an established diagnosis of IBS (Rome IV criteria), celiac disease and inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) attending a tertiary medical center, as well as healthy volunteers were interviewed by a psychologist. Early life adverse events were assessed during the semi-structured interview using a modified version of the Adverse Childhood Experience (ACE) questionnaire. Number of early life events and the presence of GI and extraintestinal symptoms based on a 10-point Likert scale were quantified. Data are presented as Median (IQR) and n (%). Statistical analysis was performed using Mann-Whitney and Fisher’s exact tests as appropriate. Results Sixty-eight patients (18 IBS, 28 celiac, 22 IBD) and 23 healthy controls were enrolled in the study. Patients with IBS, celiac disease and IBD had increased number of early life events compared with healthy controls (6.5 (4.8–8.3), 5.0 (3.0–9.0), 6.0 (4–8.3) vs 2.0 (1.0–4.0) respectively, p<0.0001). Patients reported a higher number of mental disorders in their mothers (IBS p=0.01; celiac disease p=0.01; IBD p=0.001) and increased number of close family member abusing alcohol or drugs during their childhood (IBS p=0.01; celiac p=0.02; IBD p=0.02) compared to healthy controls. History of sexual abuse was higher in patients with IBS (p=0.01), while history of verbal abuse was higher in patients celiac disease and IBD (p=0.003 and p=0.001, respectively) compared to healthy controls. The number of early life adverse events was strongly correlated with number of GI (r= 0.91; p=0.01) and extra-intestinal (r=0.87; p=0.02) symptoms, but not with symptoms severity. Most patients with IBS (83.3%), celiac disease (89.3%) and IBD (85.7%) reported stressful events before the onset of their disease. Conclusions Adverse events in childhood are frequent in patients with chronic GI disorders, both of functional and organic origin. Furthermore, stressful events often precede their diagnosis. These data strongly suggest that better psychosocial assessment in patients with chronic GI disorders is needed to improve their overall management. Funding Agencies None

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.181
Teacher spread0.174 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the Canadian Association of GastroenterologySame topicGastrointestinal motility and disordersFrench-language works237,207