MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3008835130 · doi:10.4212/cjhp.v73i1.2954

Rebleeding in Variceal and Nonvariceal Gastrointestinal Bleeds in Cirrhotic Patients Using Vitamin K1: The LIVER-K Study

2020· article· en· W3008835130 on OpenAlexaffvenueabout
Duane Bates, Jenny Edwards, Ashten Langevin, Adrian Abu-Ulba, Faizath S. Yallou, Ben Wilson, Sunita Ghosh

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Canadian Journal of Hospital Pharmacy · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicLiver Disease and Transplantation
Canadian institutionsUniversity of CalgaryFoothills Medical CentreAlberta Health Services
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineCirrhosisInternal medicineGastroenterologyUpper gastrointestinal bleedingVaricesGastrointestinal bleedingVitaminIntensive care unitEndoscopy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ABSTRACTBackground: Gastroesophageal varices are the most common cause of upper gastrointestinal bleeding (UGIB) in patients with cirrhosis. Vitamin K1 is commonly administered to patients presenting with UGIB andelevated international normalized ratio, despite limited evidence to support this practice.Objectives: The primary objective was to describe the incidence of rebleeding within 30 days after vitamin K1 administration in patients with cirrhosis and UGIB. The secondary objective was to describe prescribing patterns for vitamin K1.Methods: This retrospective, descriptive multicentre study involved patients with cirrhosis and UGIB who were admitted to any of the 4 adult acute care hospitals in Calgary, Alberta, from January 1, 2014, to December 31, 2016. Patients were divided into 2 groups: those who received vitamin K1 and those who did not.Results: A total of 370 patients met the inclusion criteria, of whom 243 received vitamin K1 and 127 did not. Baseline characteristics were similar between the groups. Greater proportions of patients in the vitamin K1 group received transfusions of packed red blood cells, fresh frozen plasma, platelets, cryoprecipitate, or prothrombin concentrate during their admissions. There was no significant difference in the duration of octreotide and pantoprazole infusions. Among patients in the vitamin K1 group, there were more admissions to the intensive care unit and longerlengths of stay. More patients in the no vitamin K1 group had esophageal varices evident on endoscopy that required endoscopic treatment. Forty of the patients (16.5%) in the vitamin K1 group and 7 (5.5%) in the novitamin K1 group had rebleeding within 30 days of the initial bleed. The median total vitamin K1 dose administered was 25 mg.Conclusions: The study results suggest that vitamin K1 does not reduce the incidence of rebleeding within 30 days of the initial bleed in patients with cirrhosis and UGIB.RÉSUMÉContexte : Les varices oesophagiennes sont la cause la plus fréquente de l’hémorragie gastro-intestinale supérieure (HGIS) parmi les patients atteints de cirrhose. On administre communément de la vitamine K1 aux patientsprésentant une HGIS et dont la mesure du rapport international normalize (RIN) est élevée, malgré le manque de preuves soutenant cette pratique.Objectifs : L’objectif principal consistait à décrire la fréquence de la reprise du saignement dans les 30 jours après l’administration de la vitamine K1 à des patients atteints de cirrhose et de HGIS. L’objectif secondaire consistait à décrire les schémas de prescription de la vitamine K1.Méthode : Cette étude multicentrique, descriptive et rétrospective comprenait des patients atteints de cirrhose et de HGIS, ayant été admis à n’importe lesquels des quatre hôpitaux de soins actifs pour adultes de Calgary, Alberta, du 1er janvier 2014 au 31 décembre 2016. Les patients étaient répartis en deux groupes : ceux ayant reçu de la vitamin K1 et ceux n’en ayant pas reçu.Résultats : Le nombre total de 370 patients correspondait aux critères d’inclusion. Parmi ceux-ci, 243 avaient reçu de la vitamine K1 et 127 n’en n’avaient pas reçu. Les caractéristiques de base étaient similaires entre lesgroupes. Un plus grand nombre de patients du groupe « Vitamine K1 » avaient reçu une transfusion d’un concentré de globules rouges, de plasma frais congelé, de plaquettes, de cryoprécipité ou de concentré de prothrombine au cours de leur séjour hospitalier. On n’a noté aucune différence significative dans la durée des injections de pantoprazole et d’octréotide. Le nombre d’admissions de patients du groupe « Vitamine K1 » à l’unité de soins intensifs était plus élevé et le séjour de ceux-ci était plus long. L’endoscopie a montré qu’un plus grand nombre de patients du groupe « Sans vitamine K1 » présentaient des varices oesophagiennes nécessitant un traitement endoscopique. Dans les 30 jours après le saignement initial, quarante (16,5 %) patients du groupe « Vitamine K1 » et 7 (5,5 %) du groupe « Sans vitamine K1 » ont subi une nouvelle hémorragie. La dose moyenne totale de vitamine K1 administrée était de 25 mg.Conclusions : Les résultats de l’étude tendent à démontrer que la vitamin K1 ne réduit pas la fréquence de la reprise du saignement dans les 30 jours qui suivent le saignement initial parmi les patients atteints de cirrhose et de HGIS.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.022
Threshold uncertainty score0.043

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.267
Teacher spread0.234 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2020
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Canadian Journal of Hospital PharmacySame topicLiver Disease and TransplantationFrench-language works237,207