Bibliographic record
Abstract
Archaeological investigations of southern regions of our country have a long story. By the efforts of amateurs and connoisseurs of antiquities, and as time academics were discovered hundreds of the new sites that got its place on archaeological maps. The history of archaeology operates by dozen archaeological maps created since 2nd quarter of 19th century to the present day. They were good spotlighted of territories exploration degree at certain stages of scientific development, illustrated priority subject matters for researchers, and the level of demand of special knowledge and instruments required for creating a qualitative cartography product. A significant role in the emergence of archaeological maps of the region played by Odesa Society of History and Antiquities and Kherson museum, Archaeological Congresses, large-scale archaeology investigations of 1960s—80s. Archaeological cartography was born within science since 19th century and on the crossroads of centuries is make a claim for being separate science line. But in Soviet Period it was relegated to almost illustrative only. And even still it had not become a powerful tool as in archaeology, and more, in the field of protection of archaeological sites.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.025 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".