MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3008905225 · doi:10.1117/12.2542086

Impact of open surface area of multi-well microelectrode array on mammalian brain cells recording efficiency

2020· article· en· W3008905225 on OpenAlexaff
Roofia Sara Pishgar, Pierre Wijdenes, Fahad Iqbal, Kazim Haider, Atika Syeda, Naweed I. Syed, Colin Dalton

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicNeuroscience and Neural Engineering
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMicroelectrodeMultielectrode arraySurface (topology)Materials scienceComputer scienceChemistryElectrodeMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Neuro-electrophysiology allows scientists to investigate the underlying electrical properties that constitute brain neural network assembly. Developing tools to study these properties is a rapidly-evolving research field, and recent advancements in micro electrode arrays (MEAs) is opening a new frontier in long-term data acquisition. MEA microfabrication techniques have advanced over the years and led to different types of electrodes. The objective of this study was to optimize MEA design featuring multiple wells per electrodes (MW-MEA), to improve the recording efficiency of MEAs used for in vitro electrophysiological recordings. Methods: Two multi-well electrode designs (5 wells with diameter of 20 &mu;m vs. 6 wells with diameter of 15 &mu;m) were evaluated. Peak to peak signal amplitude of the recorded signals and the noise levels were studied and the signal to noise ratios (SNR) were determined. Results: The signal amplitudes recorded by electrodes with 6 wells (1060.3 &mu;m<sup>2</sup> ) was higher than those recorded by 5-wells electrodes (1570.8 &mu;m<sup>2</sup> ), while the noise level remained identical in both designs (31.3 &mu;v &plusmn; 10.2). As such, the SNR recorded by the 6-wells electrodes showed a 1.8-time increase, compared to the electrodes with 5 wells, although the diameter of the wells in the former design was smaller. The results of this study demonstrated an inverse relation between SNR and open surface area of electrodes. Significance: The identified relation between electrode well characteristics and MW-MEA performance and design optimization can improve signals’ resolution during long-term spontaneous extracellular recordings and thus the quality of brain cell activity recordings.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.683

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.068
GPT teacher head0.313
Teacher spread0.245 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicNeuroscience and Neural EngineeringFrench-language works237,207