MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3009037215 · doi:10.1109/mpe.2020.2974607

Study of Transmission/Distribution Network With Large Number of Power Electronic Devices Using Hybrid Simulation

2020· article· en· W3009037215 on OpenAlexaff
Xi Lin, Pouya Zadkhast

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Power and Energy Magazine · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicReal-time simulation and control systems
Canadian institutionsPowertech Labs (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsElectric power systemElectric power transmissionPower transmissionTransformerElectrical engineeringComputer scienceReal Time Digital SimulatorTransient (computer programming)Power electronicsPower engineeringTransmission systemVoltageElectronic engineeringPower (physics)EngineeringTransmission (telecommunications)Power factorPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Power System Networks are generally regarded as the most complex structures ever built by humanity. In an interconnected power system, there are tens of thousands of buses, transmission lines, transformers, generators etc., and they work together in one large network to supply the necessary power to the human society. While the behaviors of the power system are subject to basic physical laws, such as the Kirchhoff Law where sum of all currents injected to a node is zero, to study or predict such behaviors turned out to be quite complex. Digital time-domain simulation tools have been extensively used in power system studies since 1960's. In many areas including transient stability analysis, switching over-voltage analysis, and power electronic studies, such simulation platforms have become the industry standard tools.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.013
Threshold uncertainty score0.025

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.231
Teacher spread0.222 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Power and Energy MagazineSame topicReal-time simulation and control systemsFrench-language works237,207