Myofibrillar Myopathy Mimicking Polyneuropathy
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A 76-year-old man with a 5-year history of gait difficulties was suspected to have length-dependent sensorimotor polyneuropathy. Electrodiagnostic results pointed to a foot drop of neurogenic etiology, except for the prominence of myotonic discharges on needle EMG. Tests for acquired and genetic causes of polyneuropathy were unrevealing. The patient's first-degree cousin, with a much different clinical phenotype had been diagnosed with myofibrillar myopathy. Our patient was eventually found to carry the same myotilin c.179C>T p.Ser60Phe mutation. Muscle MRI was helpful in delineating clinically unsuspected involvement of paraspinal and pelvi-femoral muscles, as well as showing marked myopathic fatty infiltration of distal leg muscles. The association of neuropathy and myopathy is a recognized feature of myofibrillar myopathy. In some patients with unexplained foot drop, whole-body muscle MRI and a dedicated genetic mutation testing strategy may help reveal a diagnosis of genetic myopathy.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".