MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3009067066

Leber Hereditary Optic Neuropathy: Visual Prognosis

2020· article· en· W3009067066 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Guillaume Chabot, Jacinthe Rouleau, Ahmed Zaki Anwar El-Haffaf, Luis Hum Berto Ospina

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicDrug-Induced Ocular Toxicity
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLeber's hereditary optic neuropathyOptic neuropathyMedicineVisual acuityPediatricsOphthalmologyOptic nerve
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Leber hereditary optic neuropathy (LHON) is a mitochondrial disease which presents as a bilateral, sequential and painless central loss of vision. Around 90% of the cases are caused by 3 mutations: m.11778G>A (MT-ND4) (52-92% of cases), m.14484T>C (MT-ND6) (3-19% of cases) and m.3460G>A (MT-ND1) (1-33% of cases). Visual recovery is influenced by the mutation type involved. LHON can also be associated with cardiac and neurological manifestations. M.14484T>C (MT-ND6) is found only in 15% to 25% of cases worldwide but is responsible for 86% of all cases of LHON in French Canadian descendants. The goal of this retrospective study is to describe clinical ophthalmic and systemic manifestations, as well as the visual prognosis of LHON patients from Eastern Canada. Patient’s files were reviewed in two Montreal hospitals. We have found 23 patient’s files with a positive mutation for LHON. 87.0% had m.14484T>C (MT-ND6) and 13.0% had m.11778G>A (MT-ND4). No case of m.3460G>A (MT-ND1) was found in our patients. Visual recovery occurred in 23.7% of m.14484T>C (MT-ND6) and in 33.3% of m.11778G>A (MT-ND4). Final visual acuity varied from 20/20 to no light perception. Both cardiac and neurologic abnormalities were found. Our study confirms that m.14484T>C (MT-ND6) is the most prevalent in the province of Quebec, mostly inhabited by French Canadians. It is important to investigate these patients for cardiac and neurologic diseases, as both has been found in our patients.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.037
Threshold uncertainty score0.074

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.281
Teacher spread0.250 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicDrug-Induced Ocular ToxicityFrench-language works237,207