Patient and caregiver experience in the transition from hospital to home — brainstorming results from group concept mapping: a patient-oriented study
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Improving the quality of care for patients who return home after a hospital stay is an international priority; however, few jurisdictions have engaged broadly with patients and caregivers to understand what most affects their experience transitioning home. We performed Ontario-wide group concept mapping, beginning with a brainstorming phase, to understand patient and caregiver priorities in the transition. METHODS: We used group concept mapping to engage patients and caregivers who had lived experience transitioning from hospital to home in Ontario in the previous 3 years. We report on the first phase, brainstorming, conducted over 10 weeks beginning Jan. 11, 2018 via an online survey or facilitated group discussion. Participants responded to a single focal prompt: "When leaving the hospital for home, some thing(s) that affected the experience were: ____." The study team identified recurrent concepts and overarching themes. Patients and caregivers informed the study design, recruitment and data interpretation. RESULTS: In all, 665 people (263 patients [39.5%], 352 caregivers [52.9%] and 50 people who were both patient and caregiver [7.5%]) participated in brainstorming online, and 71 people participated in 1 of 8 group discussions. Participants identified 6 key areas affecting their experience of transition from hospital to home: home and community care, the discharge process, medical follow-up after discharge, medications, patient and caregiver education, and the kindness and caring of the health care team in hospital. Most notable were challenges with the timeliness, sufficiency, reliability and consistency of publicly funded home care services. INTERPRETATION: Patients and caregivers from across Ontario noted a range of issues affecting their experience transitioning from hospital to home, particularly the quality and sufficiency of publicly funded home care. Our findings will be used to inform a provincial quality standard on the transition from hospital to home.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".