MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3009149236 · doi:10.1145/2534169.2491714

Smart in-network deduplication for storage-aware SDN

2013· article· en· W3009149236 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicCaching and Content Delivery
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsData deduplicationComputer scienceBottleneckComputer networkSearch engine indexingDistributed computingOverhead (engineering)Software-defined networkingOperating systemEmbedded system

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In order to efficiently handle the rapid growth of data and reduce the overhead of network transmission, we propose an in-network deduplication for storage-aware Software Defined Network (SDN), called SMIND. Unlike conventional source or destination deduplication schemes, SMIND implements in-network deduplication via SDN. Moreover, to address the performance bottleneck of accessing and indexing SDN controller, we implement an SDN-enabled Flash Translation Layer (FTL) in a real prototype of Solid State Disk (SSD). Experimental results demonstrate the efficiency and efficacy of SMIND.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.659
Threshold uncertainty score0.857

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0040.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.272
Teacher spread0.239 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it