MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3009175754 · doi:10.7202/1067581ar

LA VERTU ARISTOTÉLICIENNE REVISITÉE

2020· article· fr· W3009175754 on OpenAlexaff
Pierre Métivier

Bibliographic record

VenueScience et Esprit · 2020
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicLegal and Social Philosophy
Canadian institutionsDominican University College
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPhilosophyVirtueEthnologyEpistemologySociology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Je me propose de revisiter la notion de vertu chez Aristote ; elle a traversé les temps et les cultures, et elle se trouve aujourd’hui au coeur même de ce que nous appelons l’éthique des vertus. Je soulignerai ce que cette notion de vertu a de juste, ce qu’elle a d’incontestable. Une comparaison avec la vertu chez Kant nous fera saisir ce qui fait la richesse du concept aristotélicien. Comme ce concept a non moins une faiblesse qui explique des impasses dans l’éthique, j’indiquerai la correction nécessaire qui s’impose. Ici, nous serons en compagnie de Thomas d’Aquin.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesScience and technology studies
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.966
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.004
Science and technology studies0.0010.007
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.045
GPT teacher head0.324
Teacher spread0.279 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueScience et EspritSame topicLegal and Social PhilosophyFrench-language works237,207