Numerically simulated comparative performance of a scramjet and shcramjet at Mach 11
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This study investigates the design and aeropropulsive performance of a complete, hydrogen powered, shock-induced combustion ramjet (shcramjet) at a flight Mach number of 11 and altitude of 34.5 km. The design includes a Prandtl-Meyer compression inlet, cantilevered ramp fuel injectors, a shock-inducing wedge and a divergent nozzle. Numerical studies are undertaken using the WARP code that solves the three-dimensional Favre-averaged Navier-Stokes equations closed by the Wilcox k-ω turbulence model and the Jachimowski H2/air chemical kinetics model. Studies of fuel injection properties, mixing duct length, combustor wedge and nozzle geometry are completed to maximize the overall performance of the vehicle. The final shcramjet configuration generates a specific impulse of 1110 s. A comparison is undertaken with a scramjet vehicle at identical flight conditions and using many of the same components. The comparable scramjet generates a higher specific impulse of 1450 s although it is significantly larger and therefore heavier.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".