MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3009321403 · doi:10.22215/etd/2020-13900

Towards Real-time sludge dewatering process optimization using ultraviolet-visible spectrophotometry and torque rheology

2020· dissertation· en· W3009321403 on OpenAlexaff
Jordan Gerber

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicPhosphorus and nutrient management
Canadian institutionsCarleton University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSpectrophotometryDewateringSewage treatmentSedimentationWastewaterProcess (computing)Process engineeringChemistryEnvironmental scienceMaterials sciencePulp and paper industryChromatographyEnvironmental engineeringComputer scienceEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The treatment of biosolids is becoming a larger focus of wastewater treatment facilities due to the growing associated costs and optimization potentials.Presently, most operations are controlled manually, which often results in sub-optimal process performance.The goals of this research were to develop systems to optimize sludge treatment processes.The first study in this thesis analyzed and improved the sensitivity of UV-Vis spectrophotometry for the detection of polymer in dewatered sludge supernatant.The second study developed a two-stage in-line and real-time optimum polymer dose monitoring system.This system employed torque rheology as the upstream monitor and UV-Vis spectrophotometry as the downstream monitor relative to the dewatering process.Laboratory scale experiments found the system to be generally reliable and accurate.The third study developed a method for nutrient recovery optimization in sludge supernatant after dewatering.This method employed UV-Vis spectrophotometry as a monitor for struvite formation through magnesium addition.spectrophotometry post-dewatering .....

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.244
Teacher spread0.237 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicPhosphorus and nutrient managementFrench-language works237,207