MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3009349884 · doi:10.3138/9781487535032

On the margins of urban South Korea: core location as method and praxis

2019· book· en· W3009349884 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Jesook Song, Laam Hae

Bibliographic record

VenueTSpace · 2019
Typebook
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicKorean Urban and Social Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersKorea Research Institute for Human SettlementsMinistry of Land, Transport and Maritime AffairsMinistry of Education, IndiaPennsylvania Sea Grant, Pennsylvania State UniversityAcademy of Korean StudiesSocial Sciences and Humanities Research Council of CanadaUniversity of TorontoMinistry of EnvironmentMinistry of Land, Infrastructure and TransportMinistry of EducationGovernment of CanadaKorean Studies Promotion Service
KeywordsPraxisCore (optical fiber)GeographyRegional sciencePolitical scienceComputer scienceTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This book provides a rich and illuminating account of the peripheries of urban, regional, and transnational development in South Korea. Examining cases set in Chinatown, the Jeju English education city, rural areas of migrant wives, greenbelts, anti-poverty activist sites, places of community activism, and textile factories in Korea, each chapter develops a relational understanding of a place, in which a place is analyzed as a constellation of local and global forces and processes that interact and contradict in particular ways. Each chapter also explores multiple modes of urban marginality, and discusses how understanding them shapes the methods of academic praxis for social justice causes and decolonial scholarship.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.022

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.003
Science and technology studies0.0040.014
Scholarly communication0.0070.007
Open science0.0010.004
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.286
Teacher spread0.261 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTSpaceSame topicKorean Urban and Social StudiesFrench-language works237,207