Bibliographic record
Abstract
Our chapter looks at the role of the Haida Gwaii Museum throughout the history of Haida repatriation efforts and as an integral part of modern Haida culture. It approaches this story from two perspectives: that of a Haida curator from the Kaay’ahl Laanaas XaaydaGa of the Haida Nation who has played a leading role within the Haida Repatriation Committee, and that of a Canadian museum anthropologist interested in the relations between museums and Indigenous peoples. The story of the Haida Gwaii Museum challenges any easy assumptions that being in favour of repatriation entails a stance against museums. Instead, the story positions museums not only as colonial institutions that return collections, but equally as community and Indigenous institutions that receive, steward, and help create cultural treasures. Focusing locally enables us to reflect on the ways repatriation shapes museum practice, staff, and visitors. Ultimately, we imagine a future where the Haida Gwaii Museum and museums more broadly actively create communities through reconciliation and repatriation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".