What Is the Cost of a “Cast Holiday” in Treating Children With Early Onset Scoliosis (EOS) With Elongation Derotation Flexion (EDF, “Mehta”) Casting?
Bibliographic record
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Serial casting of children with early onset scoliosis (EOS) is an established treatment option. A break from cast treatment often called a "cast holiday," (CH) is often allowed by some centers, particularly over the summer months. The impact of CHs on treatment duration or outcome has not been examined. METHODS: Institution review board approved retrospective review of children treated for EOS with elongation derotation flexion ("Mehta") casting at a children's hospital between 2001 and 2016 with a minimum of 2 years' follow-up. A CH was defined as a minimum of 4 weeks out of the cast, braced, or unbraced.The analysis was performed to determine the impact of a CH within the first 18 months of treatment. Separate analyses were performed for the entire cohort of children castedduring the study period, and then separately looking at idiopathic EOS in isolation. The impact of a CH was assessed in terms of the likelihood of achieving scoliosis <15 degrees at the final follow-up ("success"). Odds ratios were used to assess group differences between "success" ratios, and Student t tests assessed group differences for parametric data. RESULTS: Ninety children met inclusion and exclusion criteria, 31 of whom took a CH during the first 18 months of treatment (34%). This included 59 patients with idiopathic EOS (66%), 18 with syndromic EOS, 5 congenital, and 1 neuromuscular. There were no statistically significant differences between CH and no CH groups.Forty-four percent of the no CH group achieved scoliosis <15 degrees at final follow-up, as opposed to 13% of the CH group, an odds ratio of 5.3 for success without a CH. When limited to children with idiopathic EOS, 56% achieved success in the no CH, versus only 22% in the group that took a CH, an odds ratio of 4.4 for success with no CH. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates that children treated for EOS with serial casting who take a CH within the first 18 months of treatment are less likely to achieve scoliosis <15 degrees than those who persist with treatment. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.029 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".