MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3009381066

Going beyond conventional osmotic dehydration for quality advantage and energy savings

2010· article· en· W3009381066 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueEthiopian Journal of Applied Science and Technology · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicFood Drying and Modeling
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOsmotic dehydrationMoistureShrinkagePulp and paper industryChemistryMass transferDehydrationWater contentProcess engineeringEnvironmental scienceMaterials scienceChromatographyEngineeringComposite material
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Osmotic drying is a partial dehydration process, often considered more as a treatment, togive the product a quality improvement over the conventional drying process. Theosmotic treatment involves soaking of a food in hypertonic solution of sugar and/or saltfor specific times under controlled temperature condition. The process involves twocounter-current mass transfers, a loss of water from the food to the solution and thesimultaneous migration of solids from solution to the food. Such mass transferphenomena are governed by pretreatment, osmotic solution, product and osmoticenvironment related factors. The method has two major advantages when combined orcompared with other drying methods. The quality of osmotically dehydrated products isbetter and shrinkage is considerably lower as compared to products from conventionaldrying processes. Secondly, the technique helps to conserve the overall energy relative toother drying procedures. The first aspect has been widely studied while the energyaspects are addressed rather scarcely. The major objective of this paper is to discuss theadvantage of osmotic dehydration in terms of energy reduction and its potentialcontribution to maximize profit by reducing the associated costs. The osmoticdehydration step can be done before, during or after the conventional drying process toenhance the mass transfer rate or to shorten the duration of drying time. After the osmotictreatment, the moisture content of fruits and vegetable are usually reduced by 30-50%(wet basis). The amount of residual moisture in the product determines the duration andthe energy required to finish dry the product to achieve the desired product stability. Thisreduction in moisture has a significant impact in conservation of energy when thetechnique complements other conventional drying methods like convective, freeze,microwave and vacuum drying. Moisture removal by phase change (evaporation ofwater) is an energy intensive process due to high latent heat of vaporization of water.During osmotic dehydration, there is no phase transition and the process can be donewith minimum supply of energy, which is the principal reason for the energy savings.Novel approaches in food drying are constantly being explored to minimize the energydemand and maximize profit.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.422
Threshold uncertainty score0.299

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.252
Teacher spread0.240 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it