Air and temperature sensitivity of n-type polymer materials to meet and exceed the standard of N2200
Bibliographic record
Abstract
N-type organic semiconductors are notoriously unstable in air, requiring the design of new materials that focuses on lowering their LUMO energy levels and enhancing their air stability in organic electronic devices such as organic thin-film transistors (OTFTs). Since the discovery of the notably air stable and high electron mobility polymer poly{[N,N'-bis (2-octyldodecyl)- naphthalene-1,4,5,8-bis(dicarboximide)-2,6-diyl]-alt-5,5'-(2,29-bisthiophene)} (N2200), it has become a popular n-type semiconductor, with numerous materials being designed to mimic its structure. Although N2200 itself is well-studied, many of these comparable materials have not been sufficiently characterized to compare their air stability to N2200. To further the development of air stable and high mobility n-type organic semiconductors, N2200 was studied in organic thin film transistors alongside three N2200-based analogues as well as a recently developed polymer based on a (3E,7E)-3,7-bis(2-oxoindolin-3-ylidene)benzo[1,2-b:4,5-b']difuran-2,6(3 H,7 H)-dione (IBDF) core. This IBDF polymer has demonstrated promising field-effect mobility and air stability in drop-cast OTFTs. While N2200 outperformed its analogues, the IBDF-based polymer displayed superior air and temperature stability compared to N2200. Overall, polymers with more heteroatoms displayed greater air stability. These findings will support the development of new air-stable materials, and further demonstrate the persistent need for the development of novel n-type semiconductors.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".