MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

First Observation of Excited <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ω</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi>b</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>−</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math> States

2020· article· lv· W3009398515 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysical Review Letters · 2020
Typearticle
Languagelv
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicParticle physics theoretical and experimental studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersStaatssekretariat für Bildung, Forschung und InnovationInstituto Nazionale di Fisica NucleareScience and Technology Facilities CouncilCentro Svizzero di Calcolo ScientificoFinanciadora de Estudos e ProjetosCentre National de la Recherche ScientifiqueNational Academy of Sciences of UkraineFundação Carlos Chagas Filho de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado do Rio de JaneiroMinisterstwo Edukacji i NaukiRoyal SocietyMinisterio de Economía y CompetitividadMax-Planck-GesellschaftMinisterul Educaţiei NaţionaleDeutsches Elektronen-SynchrotronGeneralitat ValencianaPoultry Industry CouncilChinese Academy of SciencesCoordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível SuperiorRussian Foundation for Basic ResearchConselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e TecnológicoU.S. Department of EnergyNational Natural Science Foundation of ChinaMinistry of Science and Technology of the People's Republic of ChinaNederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk OnderzoekAgence Nationale de la RechercheRussian Science FoundationLeverhulme TrustAlexander von Humboldt-StiftungOffice of Strategic CoordinationInstitutul National de Cercetare-Dezvoltare pentru Fizica si Inginerie Nucleara 'Horia Hulubei'Deutsche ForschungsgemeinschaftNarodowe Centrum NaukiBundesministerium für Bildung und ForschungKarlsruhe Institute of TechnologyH2020 Marie Skłodowska-Curie ActionsSchweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung
KeywordsPhysicsLuminosityExcited stateAnalytical Chemistry (journal)Nuclear physicsAstrophysicsChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Excited ${\mathrm{\ensuremath{\Omega}}}_{b}^{\ensuremath{-}}$ baryons are seen as narrow peaks in the ${\mathrm{\ensuremath{\Xi}}}_{b}^{0}\phantom{\rule{0}{0ex}}{K}^{\ensuremath{-}}$ mass spectra for the first time.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.894
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.003
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0020.003
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0030.003
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.4390.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.251
Teacher spread0.230 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it