An evaluation of knowledge and concerns in women of child-bearing potential living with chronic hepatitis C infection
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background: There is little research focused on women living with the hepatitis C virus (HCV). We evaluated the knowledge, opinions, and concerns of women living with HCV of child-bearing potential. We specifically focused on pregnancy-related and child rearing issues. Methods: Fifteen women aged 29 to 45 seen at The Ottawa Hospital Viral Hepatitis Program between July 2017 and June 2018 consented and completed a questionnaire. Eighty percent were born in Canada. The average duration of infection was 7.2 years. Results: The majority (67%-93%) of respondents reported health concerns, fear of stigma, and shame related to their HCV diagnoses. Most (80%) feared transmitting HCV to their partner. Women are more willing to seek a partner and/or have children if they are cured of HCV. HCV-specific knowledge-as it pertains to transmission risk and direct-acting antiviral (DAA) safety during pregnancy and child rearing-was suboptimal and did not correlate with education level. All participants expressed a high degree of desire to receive DAA therapy. Conclusions: Better strategies to increase HCV-specific knowledge in women of child-bearing potential are required. Efforts to increase screening and treatment access in this population are warranted.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".