Health Care with Indigenous Women: Respectful Partnerships
Bibliographic record
Abstract
World cultures are comprised of two forms -individualist and collectivist. The dominant form of culture in western Europe and North America is the individualist form. However, most of the world's cultures, including Indigenous cultures, are collectivist, where loyalty to community and relationality outweighs individualism. In a shared world, we need dialogue between and among cultures if we are to achieve harmony and understanding. The health state of Canada's Indigenous people is considerably lower than that of non-Indigenous Canadians. Health inequities are associated with low income and a lack of accessible and culturally safe health care. A complex web of socioeconomic, cultural, historical, and political factors affects health. Partnerships grounded in respect in working with Indigenous communities can begin to address health inequities. A Two-Eyed Seeing approach serves as a guide to respectful partnerships by bringing people with different ways of knowing together. Using illustrative stories and findings from our respective practice and research in Mi'kmaw and Inuit communities, and informed by the Truth and Reconciliation Committee of Canada report, this paper is a philosophical discussion of the importance of respectful and trustworthy relationships between Indigenous and non-Indigenous people.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".