MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3009490654

Pedro Pascasio Fernández Sardino o la desilusión monárquica

2020· article· es· W3009490654 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Alfredo González Hermoso

Bibliographic record

VenueCuadernos republicanos · 2020
Typearticle
Languagees
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicMedia, Journalism, and Communication History
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMonarchyHumanitiesConstitutionQuarter (Canadian coin)ArtAncient historyPoliticsLawHistoryPolitical scienceArchaeology
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

espanolFernandez Sardino (1781-1827) fue una figura comprometida del periodismo espanol que cubrio casi un cuarto de siglo (1808-1825) siempre en defensa de la Constitucion de 1812 y de la Monarquia Constitucional. La actitud del rey Fernando VII, que por sus numerosas traiciones paso de monarca deseado a felon, llevo a Sardino, decepcionado por la monarquia, a apelar a un hombre providencial que salvara a Espana, dejando asi traslucir el «alma republicana» que llevaba dentro. EnglishFernandez Sardino (1781-1827) was a committed figure of Spanish journalism spanning almost a quarter of a century (1808-1825) who constantly defended the 1812 Constitution and Constitutional Monarchy. However, Fernando VII’s position and countless betrayals changed Sardino’s opinion of the king, from revered monarch to villain. His disillusion with the monarchy incited him to solicit a providential man who could save Spain, thus revealing the « republican spirit » he held in his heart.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.033
Threshold uncertainty score0.075

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.002
Scholarly communication0.0050.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0230.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.069
GPT teacher head0.261
Teacher spread0.192 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCuadernos republicanosSame topicMedia, Journalism, and Communication HistoryFrench-language works237,207