MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3009513064 · doi:10.1111/2041-210x.13385

<scp>viewshed3d</scp>: An <scp>r</scp> package for quantifying 3D visibility using terrestrial lidar data

2020· article· en· W3009513064 on OpenAlexaff
Bastien Lecigne, Jan U.H. Eitel, Janet L. Rachlow

Bibliographic record

VenueMethods in Ecology and Evolution · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicWildlife Ecology and Conservation
Canadian institutionsHydro-QuébecUniversité du Québec à MontréalNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
FundersNational Institute of Food and AgricultureU.S. Department of Agriculture
KeywordsViewshed analysisVisibilityWorkflowComputer scienceLidarPoint cloudViewpointsR packageRemote sensingEnvironmental scienceComputer graphics (images)GeographyComputer visionDatabaseMeteorology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Visual information affects animal behaviour and fitness in diverse ways, but a lack of suitable methods to quantify visibility in three‐dimensional (3D) environments limits applications of the concept of visibility in ecological research. The viewshed3d r package is dedicated to quantifying the visual environment from a single location or from a cumulation of viewpoints based on 3D point clouds acquired with terrestrial laser scanning. We present the entire workflow required to prepare the data and perform the visibility analyses in viewshed3d. This approach can help unlock the potential contributions of viewshed analyses to the emerging subdiscipline of ‘viewshed ecology’.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.009
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.134
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.009
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.172
GPT teacher head0.399
Teacher spread0.227 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations34
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMethods in Ecology and EvolutionSame topicWildlife Ecology and ConservationFrench-language works237,207