MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3009526088 · doi:10.24908/ijesjp.v7i2.13685

Sistema Integrado de Comercialização para Produtos da Agricultura Familiar

2020· article· pt· W3009526088 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Engineering Social Justice and Peace · 2020
Typearticle
Languagept
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicRural Development and Agriculture
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesAgricultural scienceGeographyArtBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Os pequenos agricultores sofrem com diversas desvantagens competitivas. Uma dessas desvantagens é a falta de ferramentas informacionais que os auxiliem no processo de comercialização. Assim, o Núcleo de Solidariedade Técnica (Soltec/NIDES/UFRJ) iniciou o desenvolvimento do Sistema Integrado de Comercialização para Produtos da Agricultura Familiar (SIPAF). A proposta do trabalho é, sob esse contexto, trabalhar no desenvolvimento de sistemas de apoio às feiras de comercialização de produtos da agricultura familiar. Para isso, foi iniciado um diálogo com a feira Terra Crioula (https://www.facebook.com/TerraCrioulaMST/), que comercializa cestas agroecológicas e acontece quinzenalmente no Rio de Janeiro. O que antes era feito manualmente foi substituído pelo site http://cesta.repos.net.br, no qual os clientes interessados se cadastram e podem comprar os produtos que desejarem. Neste artigo, analisamos o desenvolvimento desse sistema, os resultados apresentados até o momento e as perspectivas futuras do projeto.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.455
Threshold uncertainty score0.759

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.247
Teacher spread0.228 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it