Robust economic model predictive control of nonlinear networked control systems with communication delays
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Summary In this work, we consider economic model predictive control of nonlinear networked control systems subject to external disturbances and communication delays in both sensor‐to‐controller and controller‐to‐actuator channels. The problem is addressed in the framework of the min‐max model predictive control. First, a delay compensation strategy is proposed to minimize the impact of communication delays on the control performance. In the compensation strategy, once the receiver at the controller node receives a new state measurement, the controller generates a control sequence and sends the sequence to the actuator to compensate for delayed control inputs. Subsequently, the presence of disturbance is explicitly considered for robustness and the semi‐feedback min‐max optimization algorithm is used to design the control law based on the estimate of the current state reconstructed by the estimator. Furthermore, the input‐to‐state practical stability of the proposed approach is established by constructing a modified Lyapunov function. Simulation results of a numerical example and a chemical process example demonstrate the applicability and effectiveness of our approach.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it