Bibliographic record
Abstract
Frente a la emergencia de nuevas formas de desaparición en el siglo xxi, nuevos espacios aparecen asociados (por ejemplo, el desierto de Arizona-Sonora que pareciera tragarse a aquellos lo atraviesan como si fuera una «máquina de matar» o el mar Mediterráneo donde los Estados europeos «dejan morir» a los migrantes). Los nuevos tipos de desaparición no sólo presentan dinámicas particulares respecto a las desapariciones que ya conocíamos, sino que el rol mismo del espacio en ellas pareciera haberse visto conmovido de manera profunda. La novedad que trae este número especial consiste en proponer una discusión sobre el rol que juega el espacio en la emergencia de nuevas formas de desaparición e indagar, también, sobre «viejas desapariciones» pero a partir de espacios hasta ahora han sido poco analizados con relación a la desaparición forzada de personas.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.007 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.024 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".