MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Narrative Identities of Adult Hearing Aid Users

2020· article· en· W3009562392 on OpenAlexaff
Caitlyn R. Ritter, Brittan A. Barker

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Hearing Journal · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicInterpreting and Communication in Healthcare
Canadian institutionsSR Research (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNarrativeHearing aidAudiologyPsychologyMedicineArtLiterature

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

iStock/Lazy_Bear, hearing loss, health care, mental health.Human beings are constantly telling stories about their experiences and the world around them. Whether it's recapping their latest TV binge with a colleague or sharing a recent surprise encounter at a coffee shop with a friend, people construct and share stories about their experiences and the details of their lives.1 Over time these stories are internalized and evolve into one's life story. In the field of psychology, this is called narrative identity.2 One way that audiologists can better understand patients and improve the quality of their hearing health care services is by discovering and understanding the patients’ identities.3-5 In our recent qualitative study,6 we uncovered the identities that adults with hearing loss (HL) construct when telling stories about their experiences with HL and hearing aids (HAs). Our goal was to describe the nuances of these identities in a way that can ultimately help audiologists better understand their patients, improve their provision of person-centered hearing health care,6 and ensure better overall health for more adults with HL via consistent adherence to an HA treatment plan.7,8 STUDY HIGHLIGHTS In our study, 30 adults diagnosed with HL who reported using their HAs during all waking hours shared stories about their experiences surrounding their HL and HAs. We gathered the narratives via a guide based on narrative and semi-structured interviewing principles,9,10 then used thematic narrative analysis11 to categorize and understand the HA users’ identities. Our analysis revealed five narrative identities that emerged from the participants’ stories: (1) the satisfied user, (2) the overcomer, (3) the dispassionate user, (4) the resigned user, and (5) the griever. The satisfied user identity emerged from narratives in which the individual seemed to easily accept their HL and adapt to their HAs. They perceived their HAs to be beneficial and worthwhile. For example, one user named Jasper described his experience as: “I was shocked [LAUGHTER] when I left the [audiologist's] office! Woah! The high frequencies are coming in big—and I'm a commuter cyclist, so I'm on my bike quite a bit. All of a sudden, I'm hearing cars and the buzz. You know, the grinding on the street… I was really shocked at how much I'd missed and was missing.” The overcomer narrative identity was revealed in stories that underscored the obstacles individuals faced throughout their journeys. Nonetheless, these HA users were able to overcome their hardships and construct a new normal for their lives.12 This finding echoes existing research that documented people's ability to tell stories where they were able to overcome their challenges and thrive13,14—a type of resilience often linked to better health outcomes.15,16 One such user Bill shared: “…I really realized I had a deficiency in hearing because [SIGH] my communication with potential customers was… I started writing down incorrect phone numbers and incorrect addresses. I guess that's when I really realized that I had a problem. I started leaving them [HAs] on longer at that time—almost till I went to bed. And I put them on in the morning when I got up, but (to me) in a sales position that I had, it was a must. Some of the most embarrassing things with the hearing aids—I [would be in] the middle of a discussion and all of a sudden I hear “BEEP, BEEP, BEEP”—the battery would give me an indication [that it was dying]. I used to hold out as long as possible, and I would say, ‘Excuse me, Mother Nature is calling me’. I was embarrassed to, you know, change the batteries. So, I went to the bathroom and changed the batteries… The HAs were actually a key to my success in the position I had. I had a very good career with [the store], and I attribute that a lot to the HAs.” Narratives of the dispassionate users conveyed little affect regarding their HL diagnoses or experiences with HAs. Instead of describing their experiences with emotion, they focused more on describing the factual details of their experiences. For example, one such user Estelle's narrative reads relatively emotionless: “Realizing HL was a problem in the family, I decided I just needed to have hearing tests and get a hearing aid so that I would be able to at least hear as well as I thought that I might be able to.” People reflecting the resigned user narrative identity described feelings of resignation surrounding their HAs. Interestingly, they recognized the benefit of HAs while also recounting their irritation toward their HL diagnoses as well as their difficulties in adopting consistent HA use habits. They presented their HA use as an obligation rather than a choice. For example, one resigned user Leslie shared: “And I was like, ‘Oh, crap.’ I missed that entire quiz question, and I was really, really fed up with that. So, I was like, ‘Dang it. Like I am going to like at least try and do something.’ I'm really, really tired of missing important stuff in class. I had a friend at the time who was doing audiology, and she really tried to push me to come here [university clinic]. And so, yeah. Then I got fit with HAs, and it's been very interesting.” Lastly, the griever narrative identity emerged from stories where individuals were in a state of mourning surrounding their HL diagnosis and yearned for their lives to be different. As with other grievers, Janice's story suggests that she has not fully accepted her HL and wishes life was different. “It was always disappointing to me as I learned later that—you know—I could have been given some medication that I would not have had to deal with this [HL] my whole life, which hasn't always been easy [CRYING]. I don't think people realize how emotional it is to have your hearing not be where everybody else's is at.” CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS Understanding how a patient identifies is important for health care providers because the relationship that exists between who people believe they are and how they behave has significant implications for their treatment adherence.17 For example, patients with an overcomer identity (the most prevalent identity in our study6) likely face an array of experiences and emotions while adjusting to their HL diagnosis and HA adoption. During this time, these patients can either work to reduce any negative feelings and conquer existing barriers to HL acceptance and HA uptake (thus becoming an overcomer), or they can succumb to those barriers and ultimately cease HA use altogether. Audiologists should be ready to execute different counseling techniques (e.g., motivational interviewing) to facilitate how these patients work through their barriers to become overcomers instead of non-users. Similarly, when patients identify themselves as dispassionate users, audiologists must work with them to set a consistent follow-up schedule, during which the audiologists should employ robust person-centered care and effective counseling to ensure that the patients do not allow their impartiality to their HL diagnosis and HA uptake become reason enough to reduce their consistent use of HAs. In conclusion, our study begins to shed light on the narrative identities of individuals with HL who use HAs. From a clinical perspective, the findings are particularly helpful when considering how these identities are important to audiologists’ holistic understanding of individuals who are diagnosed with HL and adhere to HA recommendations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.056
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0020.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.142
GPT teacher head0.439
Teacher spread0.297 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Hearing JournalSame topicInterpreting and Communication in HealthcareFrench-language works237,207