MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3009573724 · doi:10.1117/12.2538484

Lock-in optical instrumentation for snapshot hyperspectral imaging

2020· article· en· W3009573724 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicOptical Polarization and Ellipsometry
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Guelph
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHyperspectral imagingPixelSnapshot (computer storage)OpticsImage resolutionComputer scienceImage sensorChopperCharge-coupled deviceComputer visionArtificial intelligenceRemote sensingPhysicsGeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Hyperspectral imaging (HSI) technology has become prominent, with a wide range of applications: food quality control, crop monitoring, and medical diagnostics. As HSI is able to capture spatial and spectral data, it is highly desirable, but highly complex. However, this functionality presents a challenge for data acquisition as three-dimensional HSI images must be acquired by an image sensor of one less dimension. Thus, HSI systems are often pushbroom systems, with twodimensional images being successively constructed over time from line scans. Additionally, HSI is expensive and difficult to operate. A snapshot HSI system is developed to address these challenges, whereby the additional image dimension is encoded onto an occupied dimension on the image sensor. Additionally, the snapshot HSI system is constructed from low cost, readily available components. The presented snapshot HSI system consists of a transparent diffraction optical disc bonded to an aperture mask, with alternating transparent and opaque regions, acting as an optical chopper when rotated by a DC brushless motor. This allows separation of the spectra of overlapped pixels on the HSI image sensor. When an incident beam passes through this optical chopper, many frequencies (corresponding to spatial channels) are imposed by the binary mask, while undergoing diffraction across the visible spectrum. Overlapped spectra are directed at a charge coupled device, where Fourier analyses distinguish each spatial channel. System geometry is used to transform the Fourier amplitude spectra into functions of wavelength for each spatial pixel. The design is experimentally validated through comparison to a commercially available spectrometer.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.868
Threshold uncertainty score0.236

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.228
Teacher spread0.214 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicOptical Polarization and EllipsometryFrench-language works237,207