MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3009574581

Marine Fishery Resources of Andhra Pradesh

2019· other· en· W3009574581 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Shubhadeep Ghosh, Loveson Edward, Indira Divipala, Pralaya Ranjan Behera, H. M. Manas, F Jasmin

Bibliographic record

VenueEprints@CMFRI Open Access Institutional Repository (Central Marine Fisheries Research Institute) · 2019
Typeother
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicFisheries and Aquaculture Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFishingOverexploitationFisheryMarine conservationGeographyFisheries managementPopulationQuarter (Canadian coin)Commercial fishingBiology
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Andhra Pradesh with a coastline of 974 km encompassing 9 coastal districts has had a long
\nhistory of fishing. Starting with traditional fishing in ancient times to the modern, technology-intensive
\nfishing, the marine fisheries sector of the state has grown tremendously reaching record landings of
\n3.42 lakh tonnes in 2014. The state has 555 marine fishing villages with 353 marine fish landing centres
\n(CMFRI Marine Fisheriers Census, 2010). There are two major fishing harbors at Visakhapatnam and
\nKakinada where bulk of total trawl catch (nearly 70%) is landed and three minor fishing harbors at
\nBhairavapalem, Machilipatnam and Nizamapatnam. The marine fishermen population of the state is
\nmore than 6 lakhs with roughly a quarter of them, being acive in fishery related activities throughout the
\nyear. There are 31,741 fishing crafts in the marine fisheries of Andhra pradesh (CMFRI Marine Fisheriers
\nCensus, 2010). The marine fisheries sector, at present, is an important source of employment and
\nincome generation in the state, but is plagued with several problems. As because, this sector is vulnerable
\nto external influences viz., overexploitation of marine resources, environmental degradation and climate
\nchange, efficient management is the need of the hour.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Open science, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesScience and technology studies, Open science
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.065
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.003
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0060.016
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0140.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.093
GPT teacher head0.355
Teacher spread0.261 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEprints@CMFRI Open Access Institutional Repository (Central Marine Fisheries Research Institute)Same topicFisheries and Aquaculture StudiesFrench-language works237,207