MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3009592891 · doi:10.1002/nbm.4277

Non‐negative least squares computation for in vivo myelin mapping using simulated multi‐echo spin‐echo <i>T</i> <sub>2</sub> decay data

2020· article· en· W3009592891 on OpenAlexafffund
Vanessa Wiggermann, Irene M. Vavasour, Shannon Kolind, Alex L. MacKay, Gunther Helms, Alexander Rauscher

Bibliographic record

VenueNMR in Biomedicine · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAdvanced MRI Techniques and Applications
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British ColumbiaUniversity of British Columbia Hospital
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCanada Research ChairsMichael Smith Health Research BCVetenskapsrådetNational Multiple Sclerosis Society
KeywordsMyelinWhite matterComputationSpin echoEcho (communications protocol)Nuclear magnetic resonancePhysicsChemistryMathematicsAlgorithmMagnetic resonance imagingComputer scienceBiologyNeuroscienceMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Multi‐compartment T 2 mapping has gained particular relevance for the study of myelin water in the brain. As a facilitator of rapid saltatory axonal signal transmission, myelin is a cornerstone indicator of white matter development and function. Regularized non‐negative least squares fitting of multi‐echo T 2 data has been widely employed for the computation of the myelin water fraction (MWF), and the obtained MWF maps have been histopathologically validated. MWF measurements depend upon the quality of the data acquisition, B 1 + homogeneity and a range of fitting parameters. In this special issue article, we discuss the relevance of these factors for the accurate computation of multi‐compartment T 2 and MWF maps. We generated multi‐echo spin‐echo T 2 decay curves following the Carr‐Purcell‐Meiboom‐Gill approach for various myelin concentrations and myelin T 2 scenarios by simulating the evolution of the magnetization vector between echoes based on the Bloch equations. We demonstrated that noise and imperfect refocusing flip angles yield systematic underestimations in MWF and intra−/extracellular water geometric mean T 2 (gmT 2 ). MWF estimates were more stable than myelin water gmT 2 time across different settings of the T 2 analysis. We observed that the lower limit of the T 2 distribution grid should be slightly shorter than TE 1 . Both TE 1 and the acquisition echo spacing also have to be sufficiently short to capture the rapidly decaying myelin water T 2 signal. Among all parameters of interest, the estimated MWF and intra−/extracellular water gmT 2 differed by approximately 0.13–4 percentage points and 3–4 ms, respectively, from the true values, with larger deviations observed in the presence of greater B 1 + inhomogeneities and at lower signal‐to‐noise ratio. Tailoring acquisition strategies may allow us to better characterize the T 2 distribution, including the myelin water, in vivo.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.109
GPT teacher head0.393
Teacher spread0.285 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations30
Published2020
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNMR in BiomedicineSame topicAdvanced MRI Techniques and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207