Bibliographic record
Abstract
A study conducted by Dr. Alan King in the early 2000s exposed low secondary school graduation rates and a variety of indicators of a student's likelihood of success in graduating. Premier Dalton McGuinty's Liberal government responded with a reform aimed at changing educational practices through the Student Success/Learning to 18 Strategy (SS/L18) in 2003 and Policy/Program Memorandum No. 137 in 2005. This drove a province-wide effort to support students ‘in-risk' of not graduating with a multitude of new resources and policies. Ontario's secondary school graduation rates have since increased to 82 percent, however, a variety of barriers to student success remain both socially and culturally in Ontario schools. The absence of student social and cultural capital can diminish educational opportunities for students which is problematic for an equitable system. This chapter explores the history of Student Success initiatives, the unique role played by Student Success Teachers and L.E.A.D. teacher candidates, and further areas of need to be addressed in closing the gap in education.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".